Wednesday, January 7, 2026

Process Over Applause (January 7, 2026)


2018 #ThankYourSID week picture from Pacific University


Process Over Applause

If you walked into my office, you would see the markers of a long career: awards for dedication to students, a President’s Award from CSC, and boxes filled with championship rings, watches, and trophies.

To an outsider, these are just tokens of victory. To me, they are symbols of the grueling, rewarding process required to earn them.

In the world of athletic communications—a field often defined by long hours and "thankless" behind-the-scenes work—the annual #ThankYourSID week provides a rare moment of peer recognition. While I am grateful to have been honored since its inception, this blog exists because of the other 51 weeks of the year.

Today’s topic, "Process Over Applause," is a reflection on where we stand as a profession. It’s an exploration of the intersection between the work we do and the internal drive required to do it, even when the lights are off and the crowd has gone home.



SID Validation vs. Internal Standards

In athletic communications, applause is inconsistent.

Some days your work is publicly praised. Other days it is quietly consumed. And occasionally, it is only noticed when something goes wrong.

If your sense of professional worth is tied to external validation, this reality becomes exhausting.

That is why Foundational Comfort for SIDs depends on choosing process over applause.

The Validation Trap in Athletic Communications

Validation in this profession is unpredictable:

  • Wins amplify praise; losses mute it

  • Coaches notice output differently than administrators

  • Fans react emotionally, not contextually

  • Good work is often assumed, not acknowledged

When SIDs chase validation, subtle shifts occur:

  • Standards bend to please the loudest voice

  • Priorities change based on reaction, not purpose

  • Confidence rises and falls with feedback

This creates reactive professionals instead of steady leaders.

Applause is not a reliable compass.

Process Is the Only Sustainable Anchor

Process does not fluctuate with outcomes.

Process asks:

  • Was the preparation thorough?

  • Were timelines respected?

  • Was communication clear and accurate?

  • Did the work align with institutional standards?

These questions remain valid whether the team wins or loses, whether anyone comments or not.

When SIDs commit to process, they create internal consistency in an external environment defined by inconsistency.

That consistency becomes credibility.

Internal Standards vs. External Noise

Every SID must decide:

Whose standards matter most?

External voices will always exist:

  • Coaches with urgency

  • Administrators with evolving priorities

  • Fans with opinions

  • Media with deadlines

Internal standards determine how you respond.

Foundational Comfort grows when SIDs establish non-negotiables:

  • Accuracy over speed when facts matter

  • Clarity over volume when information is fluid

  • Professional tone regardless of pressure

Internal standards do not ignore stakeholders. They protect the integrity of the work while serving them.

Process Protects You on the Hard Days

On difficult days—when results disappoint or criticism is loud—process becomes insulation.

Instead of spiraling into self-doubt, process allows you to say:

I followed the standard. I did the work the right way.

That statement does not eliminate frustration, but it prevents erosion of confidence.

Leaders who endure long careers are not those who receive the most praise.

They are those who do not require it to remain effective.

Applause Is a Byproduct, Not the Goal

Ironically, consistent process often produces recognition—eventually.

Trust builds quietly:

  • Coaches know what to expect

  • Administrators rely on your judgment

  • Colleagues seek your input

This trust rarely announces itself publicly, but it shows up in influence, autonomy, and opportunity.

Applause fades quickly. Credibility compounds.

Question

Process is a daily choice.

Ask yourself:

  • What standard am I committed to regardless of reaction?

  • Where am I adjusting my work to chase approval instead of excellence?

  • What part of my process deserves more discipline?

Foundational Comfort does not come from being noticed.

It comes from knowing your work holds up—especially when no one is clapping.

Reflection: What internal standard will you protect today, even if it earns no immediate recognition?




No comments:

Post a Comment